For AI agents: The documentation index is at https://docs.digitalocean.com/llms.txt. Markdown versions of pages use the same URL with index.html.md in place of the HTML page (for example, append index.html.md to the directory path instead of opening the HTML document).

DigitalOcean Vector Databases launches with three engines, each targeting a different workload shape. You can start with one engine and migrate later, but the choice affects your application’s data model.

The Short Version

Choose OpenSearch When

• You need hybrid search. OpenSearch’s hybrid query combined with the normalization processor is the most mature implementation of BM25 + k-NN fusion available in a managed database today.
• You already run OpenSearch for log analytics, application search, or observability, and you want to add vectors without adding another database.
• You need full-text search features such as analyzers, synonyms, phrase queries, highlighting, or aggregations alongside vector similarity.
• You need fine-grained security: role-based access control, field-level security, tenant-aware queries, or audit logging.
• You prefer a REST-first interface with official low-level clients in every language.

OpenSearch Strengths

OpenSearch combines k-NN, BM25, full-text, analytics, and log ingest in one engine. It scales horizontally and has been production-hardened across thousands of deployments since its Elasticsearch origin in 2010.

OpenSearch Tradeoffs

The broad feature surface means more to learn: mapping syntax, index settings, HNSW parameters, refresh intervals, and pipelines all need tuning. Pure vector workloads typically show slightly lower throughput than Weaviate, which is purpose-built for vectors. For cold-start simplicity on a pure RAG app, Weaviate is faster to get productive on.

Choose Weaviate When

• Your workload is pure vector, semantic search, or RAG. No log analytics, no full-text BM25 as a primary need.
• You want an opinionated, schema-aware API (collections, properties, cross-references) instead of raw index mappings.
• You want built-in vectorization modules. Weaviate ships modules for OpenAI, Cohere, Hugging Face, and other providers that auto-embed documents and queries without extra setup.
• You are building a RAG application and want the shortest path from raw text documents to similarity search results.

Weaviate Strengths

Weaviate ships schema-aware Python and TypeScript clients and supports hybrid search out of the box.

Weaviate Tradeoffs

Less flexible than OpenSearch outside the vector use case. No log ingest, no mature analytics query language. The schema-first model that simplifies the common case is restrictive when data is loosely structured.

Choose PostgreSQL When

• Your application’s source of truth is already in Postgres and vectors are a derived secondary dataset (embeddings of your existing rows).
• You want vectors and relational data joined in a single query. pgvector lets you JOIN and WHERE across vector and relational columns.
• You value operational simplicity more than peak vector performance: one database, one backup story, one connection pool, one set of credentials.
• Your vector volume is small-to-medium: up to tens of millions of vectors, ideally fewer.

PostgreSQL Strengths

pgvector is a strong fit when Postgres is already in your stack. You add vectors with a single CREATE EXTENSION vector, add a column, and get ACID-compliant reads and writes with transactional guarantees. Both HNSW and IVFFlat indexes are supported, and pgvectorscale adds StreamingDiskANN for workloads that outgrow RAM.

PostgreSQL Tradeoffs

Postgres was not designed for vector workloads. At scale (roughly more than 10 million vectors or more than 1,536 dimensions) query latency and index build time degrade faster than purpose-built vector databases. Postgres also lacks native hybrid-search mechanics; combining tsvector full-text search with pgvector similarity requires application-level fusion.

Feature Comparison

Operational Differences

• Provisioning: All three are available through the Create > Vector Database flow. Weaviate has a dedicated flow that exposes per-tenant options; OpenSearch and PostgreSQL look like standard managed databases with k-NN or pgvector enabled.
• Backups: All three get automated daily backups with point-in-time recovery. Restore from a backup creates a new cluster.
• Scaling: OpenSearch and Weaviate scale horizontally across nodes. PostgreSQL scales vertically on a single primary; read-only nodes help but do not partition the vector index.
• Client libraries: OpenSearch has low-level REST clients in most languages. Weaviate’s TypeScript and Python clients are schema-aware. PostgreSQL is accessed through any standard Postgres driver.

Migration Considerations

Migrating between vector engines is expensive if you have to re-embed. A safer pattern for any new project:

1. Separate your embedding pipeline from your database. Keep a source-of-truth table of raw documents and their embeddings in object storage or a relational database.
2. Treat the vector database as a derived index. If you change engines, you rebuild the index from the source-of-truth table without calling the embedding API again.
3. Abstract the search interface. Keep a thin application-layer class that exposes a search(query_text, filters, k) method. Swapping engines then becomes swapping the class’s implementation.

Related Resources

• Vector Search Concepts
• Managed Weaviate
• OpenSearch Vector Search Quickstart
• PostgreSQL pgvector Quickstart